State and National News

Showing 1 to 5 of 66      First | Prev | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | Next | Last

Strickland's Ties to Southern Ohio Appreciated

The southern Ohio roots of Gov. Ted Strickland certainly did not go without notice during Thursday's announcement of a possible nuclear power plant locating in Piketon.

U.S. Rep. Jean Schmidt, R-2nd District, in fact, was quick to bring those roots up early in her remarks, pointing out that to southern Ohioans, Strickland is thought of simply as "Good Ole' Ted." And those ties, she added, have benefits.

"Having someone that's locally born (in high government office) can really help a community," Schmidt said, turning to look behind her at Strickland. "Thank you for never forgetting your roots, sir."

U.S. Sen. George Voinovich also pointed to Strickland's efforts to assist his home region.

"Gov. Strickland and I have worked hard together to bring businesses and jobs to southern Ohio," he said. "As you know, we wanted Areva to build an enrichment plant right here in Piketon, next door to USEC. Although we lost that bid to Idaho in the final round, the folks at Areva told me they were very impressed with the Ohio delegation's presentation and recognition of what Piketon has to offer - the finest nuclear work force in the world, highly trained, experienced, with a work ethic that is second to none."

 …

Read the full article here.


Cash for clunkers' bill authored by Rep. Betty Sutton as economic boost gets House approval


Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Sabrina Eaton
Plain Dealer Bureau

Washington -- A "cash for clunkers" proposal designed to boost the auto industry, the economy and the environment passed the House of Representatives Tuesday in an overwhelming 298-119 vote.

The measure authored by Copley Township Democratic Rep. Betty Sutton was backed by every Democrat in the Ohio delegation, as well as Republicans Steve LaTourette of Bainbridge Township, Pat Tiberi of the Columbus area, and the Dayton area's Steve Austria and Mike Turner.

The legislation would provide consumers with vouchers of up to $4,500 toward the purchase of a new fuel-efficient vehicle if they scrap a gas guzzler with combined fuel economy of 18 miles per gallon or less. The vehicle to be discarded must be driveable and have been continuously insured to the same owner for at least a year.

Sutton's bill would provide $4 billion for the yearlong program. She said the government would offset lost gas tax revenue by collecting $60 for every vehicle that's scrapped.

Advocates said the bill would help reduce the nation's carbon emissions and its reliance on foreign oil as it provides an economic incentive for consumers to purchase new cars. A similar measure adopted in Germany boosted new car sales by 21 percent.

"This bill is also about people," Sutton enthused at a news conference after the bill's passage. "It's about the people who make those cars, who make the steel and iron that are used in those cars, it's about the dealers, it's about our environment, it's about our economy, it's about the strength of our nation."

About two-thirds of Republicans opposed the measure. Virginia's Eric Cantor noted that many consumers can't afford new cars, and complained the bill was biased against used vehicles. Arizona's Jeff Flake said it would artificially generate demand for new cars.

"This is a clunker of a bill that ought to be retired and we ought to apply the cash towards our unsustainable deficit," Flake said on the House floor.

The "cash for clunkers" concept is backed by President Barack Obama, and interest groups ranging from unions to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Sutton said she hopes the Senate will move quickly on the measure, adding that the overwhelming House vote will "hopefully be an indication to the other body there is widespread support across the country for this proposition if we could get it moving."

To reach this Plain Dealer reporter:

seaton@plaind.com, 216-999-4212

Article Here


Strickland makes case for 3C rail

Governor tells feds Ohio will be 'island' without train services

Wednesday,  June 10, 2009 2:59 AM
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH


WASHINGTON -- Gov. Ted Strickland made his pitch to federal officials yesterday for $400 million of the $8 billion in stimulus money designated for high-speed passenger rail service. He said the state would be economically adrift without it.

The money would more than cover the startup costs of a proposed rail system that would run through Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton and Cincinnati and take about six hours from start to finish. State officials envision the so-called 3C rail service, which would run slightly slower than a car moving at freeway speed, as the first step in developing much-faster rail service across the state.

The decision on how to divvy up the rail stimulus dollars could come this summer, and the Obama administration will offer formal guidance this month to states planning to apply for the money.

The administration has identified 10 rail corridors -- including a Chicago-centered route that would incorporate the Ohio corridor -- that could be in competition for the $8 billion.

Ohio's 3C corridor is the most densely populated area in the country devoid of passenger rail service and could serve 6 million people as a linchpin in a national rail network, said Strickland and Jolene Molitoris, director of the Ohio Department of Transportation. She accompanied the governor to Washington.

"If we don't do this we will be left behind," Strickland told Ohio reporters at the state's Washington office before his meetings with the federal officials. "Ohio will be an island in the middle of this nation without passenger rail service -- we will not be appropriately connected to a system that will be broad-based, and it would be intolerable for us."

Amtrak is studying how many passengers the rail service would likely attract and how much the state would need to subsidize it. The study is due in August.

The $400 million figure is up from the previous estimate of $250 million for Ohio's corridor, but Strickland said that depending on the Amtrak study's findings, the cost could wind up well below $400 million. A spokeswoman for the governor said the state hasn't yet submitted a formal proposal for money.

The rail corridor would use existing freight tracks but would require new signals, construction of parallel tracks and grade separations in congested areas, as well as passenger terminals.

State officials are pinning much of their hopes on federal stimulus money.

"What would happen if we didn't get it? That's something I can't even comment on right now," said Stu Nicholson, spokesman for the Ohio Rail Development Commission.

Strickland also said that he thinks a 3C corridor could be up and running by the first quarter of 2011, a slight delay from initial estimates of the end of 2010, and that freight-train companies CSX and Norfolk & Southern are backing Ohio's initiative.

Ohio is likely to face stiff competition for the federal cash. Although the 3C corridor is on the U.S. Department of Transportation's top 10 list, advocates for other routes also will have a chance to make their cases.

"We are waiting for the applications to come in, and we will judge them on the merits," said Jill Zuckman, a Department of Transportation spokeswoman.

Article Here


 

GOP rush to change voting rules is ruse

By Dayton Daily News

Saturday, November 29, 2008

Before the election, there was lots of fretting that things could go really badly in Ohio and that the state could end up looking like Florida in 2000.

People said that in 2004, too, and what do you want to bet that they'll say it in 2012?

But Election Day went fine, thank you very much, and, for that, Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner and the 88 county boards of elections deserve kudos. Even though turnout wasn't as heavy as the predictions suggested, there were lawsuits and directives to respond to and conspiracy theorists to counter. Meanwhile, implementing the change that allowed people to vote early — without having to offer an explanation — put huge new demands on elections officials as they were trying to gear up for Election Day itself.

Notwithstanding the success, some lawmakers want Ohioans to believe that something needs to be fixed — right now. They're proposing to make changes in the early voting law in a lame-duck session of the legislature, rather than follow Secretary Brunner's request that everyone sit tight until after a December conference designed to be a bipartisan post-game wrap-up.

She wants to put together one piece of legislation and make any fixes all at once, when the new legislature takes over next year.

Republicans are not prepared to wait. They're adamant about changing a law that they themselves wrote in 2005 that — inadvertently — allows people to register and vote in the same visit for a one-week window about a month before the actual election. They say this opportunity to kill two birds with one stone opens the door to fraud because there's no time for boards of elections to check out a new registrant's information.

The rush to pass the legislation stems from two things. Democrats are taking over the Ohio House of Representatives in January. They're more supportive of so-called "instant voting" rules. So, even though Secretary Brunner, a Democrat, says she'll support eliminating the short time when people can register and vote, Republicans know she can't control Democratic lawmakers.

Moreover, Republicans have been eager to make Secretary Brunner out to be inept and/or corrupt in anticipation of trying to take her down in two years. She's up for re-election then, and if she and Gov. Strickland are both re-elected, Democrats would have the upper hand in a group that draws state legislative district boundaries. The dominant party in that process tries to draw districts that will give it a better chance of winning seats in the Ohio Legislature.

The Republicans' leading candidate to run against Secretary Brunner is Ohio House Speaker Jon Husted, of Kettering. He's already starting to compile his list of criticisms of Secretary Brunner. If he helps pass a law that remedies the potential "fraud" that Republican partisans have been hyping, that would be good for his political resume.

(But, again, remember it was the Republicans who didn't check the calendar to determine what they were doing three years ago when they created the overlap allowing registration and voting simultaneously.)

Another issue at hand is whether to allow county boards of elections to set up more than one polling place for early voters to cast their ballots.

Having just one spot — which is all the law allows now — makes for long lines. And one thing is for sure: Many people who voted early this year will want to do so again. No sense making the process a cattle call.

Elections are supposed to be political. The administration of them, however, should be resolutely nonpartisan. Rushing piecemeal bills through just so Republicans can say they fixed something is overstating the problem and overreacting.

 



Joe Hallett: Restored U.S. admiration abroad seen in an Obama presidency
Sunday,  November 23, 2008 3:51 AM
From 1962 to 1964, I was Bill Bradley.

At that time, Bradley was a small-town kid from Missouri playing basketball at Princeton University before going to the NBA's New York Knicks en route to becoming one of the greatest players in the history of the game.

I, too, was in the NBA -- the National Barnball Association. A small-town kid, I spent endless hours on the basketball court in Roger Rice's barn -- Rice Arena -- outside Wauseon, emulating my idol at Princeton. On the rare occasions when my high-arcing jump shot swished through the net, I would simply say to my buddies, "Bradley!"

"You might have wanted to be Bill Bradley, but I wanted to be Hopalong Cassidy," Bradley said on Thursday, as we sat before an Ohio State University audience thrilled that Bradley's boyhood hero was a Buckeye football legend. Bradley hadn't spent all those years in big arenas and then another 18 in the U.S. Senate without learning how to play to the home crowd.

Bradley had been invited to OSU by the Center for U.S. Global Engagement, the John Glenn School of Public Affairs and the Columbus Council on World Affairs to discuss the foreign-policy challenges facing President-elect Barack Obama. I was the moderator, brash enough at one point to suggest that Bradley couldn't block my hook shot.

"Is there a gym open around here?" he asked.

Between the basketball banter, Bradley exhibited a worldview with an astuteness that captivated the audience and illustrated why he was a serious contender in 2000 for the Democratic presidential nomination. He said that even with the challenges of two wars and an economic crisis, Obama's presidency offers an opportunity to restore America's image around the world.

"Here is a positive event that reaffirms the resilience and strength of the American democracy and the ability of the country to make a U-turn in the middle of difficult times," Bradley said. "And, of course, there is the symbolic importance of Barack Obama being the first African-American president. So this now opens up the possibility where the world is now listening in a way it wasn't a year ago."

Just as I wanted to be Bradley and he wanted to be Cassidy, Bradley said Obama offers an alternative to Muslim children who too often have named Osama bin Laden as their hero.

"I can guarantee you after the presidential election that there are millions of Muslim kids all over the world that want to be Barack Obama. His election produced so much good will in the world that it buys us space and time."

What should Obama do with that space and time to regain the world's respect?

"Let America be America," Bradley said, contending that Obama should establish his own doctrine that supplants President George W. Bush's militarism with a measured military, diplomatic and economic approach to the world, one also with "a moral dimension" to lead by example.

"Specifically, we ought to abandon the unilateral approach to the world that we've had the last eight years, which is, 'We know what to do, and we're going to do it and we don't need you.' "

Bradley said improving relations with Russia is critical, contending that the Clinton and Bush administrations had "blown the Russian relationship over the last 16 years," beginning in the 1990s, when the U.S. did little to help Russia while it was suffering an economic depression.

"What did we do with Russia when it was down?" he said. "Nothing. We kicked them when they were down. How did we kick them? We expanded NATO. What is NATO? A military alliance. Why was it created? To counter the Soviet threat. The Soviet Union is gone. Why isn't NATO?"

The U.S. needs Russia's help to control nuclear-weapons proliferation, to thwart Iran's nuclear ambition and to fight Islamic terrorism, Bradley said. "There are a lot of things we can work on, but we've got to stop sticking them in the eye in order to form a new partnership."

When Obama delivers his Inaugural Address on Jan. 20, Bradley said, "more people will be listening to that speech, I think, than any speech in the history of man. It will be a moment."

A moment, hopefully, when America again becomes the world's idol.

Joe Hallett is senior editor at The Dispatch.

jhallett@dispatch.com



Showing 1 to 5 of 66      First | Prev | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | Next | Last

Recent Articles

 

more...

Recent Blog Posts

more...



Ohio Presidential Poll
Barack Obama
Hillary Clinton


What is the most important issue facing America in 2008?
Health Care
Iraq War
Education
Jobs and Economy
Immigration
Terrorism / Security
Environment
Taxes


Add to Technorati Favorites

RSS

 

Paid for by Ohio Democratic Party, not authorized by any federal candidate or candidate committee.
Chris Redfern, Chairman, 340 East Fulton St., Columbus, OH 43215. 
Powered by Kintera